WebMar 5, 2014 · Id. ¶ 22, 2 N.E.3d 321. While the Aguilar court specified its modified decision “is specifically limited to the Class 4 form of AUUW,” it continued, “[w]e make no finding, express or implied, with respect to the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of any other section or subsection of the AUUW statute.” Id. ¶ 22 n.3, 2 N.E.3d 321. Web1-14-1239 3 our supreme court's holding in Aguilar that the statute defining the Class 4 AUUW offense was facially unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. Therefore, defendant argued, his 2007 UUWF conviction, itself premised on that 2002 Class 2 AUUW conviction, was also void

People v. Burns :: 2015 :: Supreme Court of Illinois

WebMar 30, 2024 · The trial court merged the conviction of into the conviction of unlawful AUUW possession of a firearm by a street gang member and sentenced defendant toan aggregate of 60 ... Defendant was convicted of violating section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) of the AUUW statute. 720 ILCS 5/241.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) (West 2012).- In . People v. Aguilar WebDec 17, 2015 · In Aguilar, the defendant was convicted of AUUW pursuant to section 24–1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) of the statute, which was a Class 4 felony pursuant to section (d) of the statute. We reversed the defendant's conviction for AUUW, holding that section 24–1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) is facially unconstitutional because it operates as a flat ban on the ... nrcs channel bed stabilization

SURVEY OF ILLINOIS LAW CRIMINAL L

WebFeb 23, 2011 · The AUUW statute restricts the right to use arms for self-defense by banning every citizen from carrying a loaded, uncased and accessible firearm when the citizen is anywhere other than on his land, in his abode, in his legal dwelling, or at his fixed place of business. 720 ILCS 5/24-1.6 (West 2008). In my view, this court should determine the ... WebDefendant was convicted of violating section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) of the AUUW statute. 720 ILCS 5/24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) (West 2012). In People v. Aguilar, 2013 IL 112116, ¶ 22, our supreme court held that section of the AUUW statute unconstitutional as infringing on the right to keep and bear arms. At defendant’s sentencing hearing, the ... WebAUUW was a Class 2 felony pursuant to subsection (d) of the AUUW statute.32 Burns appealed, arguing that his AUUW conviction must be vacated because section 24-1.6(a)(1), (a)(3)(A) of the AUUW statute, under which he was convicted, infringed on his Second Amendment rights.33 nrcs cfr